SEX AT 85, WHAT A RUSH! (Washington Post)
Okay, picture it, "a guy celebrating his 21st. birthday, a girl ready to give the ultimate gift of love, and a 3rd. guy in the car watching....."watching what I'm not sure," and a car going down the highway at 85 miles an hour." Sounds juicy doesn't, well wait just a minute, it gets better, much better.
I must admit that during my time, "which is over," I have enjoyed the titillation of sex in many places, times and situations. Readers must remember, I'm the one and only inventor of the "Pretzel Hold" a very provocative position in sexual pleasuring.
There a 2 things that dumbfounds me about my newest hero.....okay, he was going 85 miles an hour, I get that, but what I don't get is the fact, "according to the police report," the guy was in the back seat, apparently having sex, if true, this act of sex completely destroys the Pretzel Holds number one ranking in positions for sex.
The number 2 thing that totally flabbergasts me is the fact that when pressed, nobody in the car actually admitted that they were driving. I can understand the 21 year old not driving, being engaged with the women, but when the guy in the front seat did not admit to driving, well.....I just don't get it, somebody had to be driving the dam car.
The end result was that the "sex on wheels" car slammed into a Taxi Cab, causing extensive damage to both cars, and a lawsuit brought by the Cab driver. Tickets were issued for reckless endangerment to the 21 year old guy and the trial begins next week in Fairfax County Virginia. We here at Chronicle headquarters will follow the results of the trial.
BAGGY PANTS FOOTBALL PLAYER CUT FROM FLIGHT! (Fox Sports on MSN)
Everybody has seen kids running around wearing those baggy pants that seem to be down around their ankles with their boxer shorts covering the vital areas of their anatomy, and like must everybody, I've thought "what the hell is holding the dam things up?" Although nobody has ever told me, I finally have heard about an action that can be taken to eradicate the unsightly eye-sore.
But first lets take a quick look at why anybody would want to wear a pair of pants that look, for all intense and purposes like they are about ready fall to at least the knee. I have talked to several people, black, white and brown, I wanted to eliminate any racial profiling right out of the box.
What I was told, emphatically that the wearing of the sloppy, bagging pants was nothing more then a fashion statement, was not a rebel stance, or a status thing. I came away with the knowledge that the baggy attire was nothing more then a phase that kids were going through, and it would soon be replaced with some other outlandish garb that the marketing executives of the fashion world would push.
U.S. Airways solved the baggy pants issue once and for all, when an airlines employee noticed that DeShon Marman's pants were below his buttocks. I for one have never been embarrassed and offended by a kid walking around in baggy pants, below his buttocks, with his underwear showing. That was not the case for the female U.S. Airways official.
Apparently the airline has a dress code that takes, "no shoes, no shirt, no service" to a new level. The airline dress code must read something like "no shoes, no shirt and no potential butt cracks allowed." Marman and the female U.S. Air employee, it seems stubbornly refused to back off from their opinions, police were called, and the football player was carted off to jail to await legal action.
The only thing that I can say is that "the cloths Cops need to ratchet down a bit, their perceived authority stance." The kid was not hurting anybody, and there were no complaints from any of the passengers, what harm was the kid doing.
A U.S. Airways spokeswomen said that the airline's dress code forbids indecent exposure or inappropriate attire. To me, this is a blatant attempt to take a person's civil rights away, I mean who the hell is to determine what is appropriate and inappropriate, what if somebody is having a bad day, or is sexually challenged. What is our world coming to, what a waste of time, and possibly taxpayers money.
All I know is the next time I fly, I won't be wearing my Zomba's, they got a hole in the back, near my buttock.
THE WORST OF THE POLARIZED AGENTS, (Washington Post)
Charles Krauthhammer is at it again, the Fox newsie contributor, Washington Post and Weekly Standard columnist is now talking about the union-owned Democratic Party and President Obama. There are many things wrong with the Democratic Party, but one of them is not schmoozing up to unions, what for, unions have lost most of their power.
Union authority and power has wained badly in the United States over the past 30 years, that it's just a shadow of it's former self. Maybe Krauthammer missed it, but states around the country are in full attack on unions, their membership, and their ability to organize with almost any voice at all. Unions were formed in the United States for very good reasons, first and foremost to protect workers in the work place.
If management hadn't used the rules by which they operated, unions would have been unnecessary. The initial issues was worker safety, shorter work days and weeks, and better pay. Before 1937 many a worker saw his work-week last 6 days, 12 hours a day. If you were injured, you were tossed aside and a new worker took your place.
Of course unions went to extremes, demanding benefits that could never, in the long term, be honored. Negotiators had to know this as did the unions, yet ridiculous settlements between unions and management were met and we now seen the aftermath.
Unions are a necessity of American labor, without their protection, labor would revert to pre-1937 and that would be a terrible plight, not only for America's workers, but for the very fabric of the country. At the present time, most relationships between labor and management has a respectful relationship, but a big part of that relationship is do to union influence.
I understand Krauthammer's debilitating condition, and I am in awe of what he has done with his life and the productivity that has defined his life. But Charles, look at both sides before you bandy around your opinions so freely, think of both issues, both sides.
Okay, picture it, "a guy celebrating his 21st. birthday, a girl ready to give the ultimate gift of love, and a 3rd. guy in the car watching....."watching what I'm not sure," and a car going down the highway at 85 miles an hour." Sounds juicy doesn't, well wait just a minute, it gets better, much better.
I must admit that during my time, "which is over," I have enjoyed the titillation of sex in many places, times and situations. Readers must remember, I'm the one and only inventor of the "Pretzel Hold" a very provocative position in sexual pleasuring.
There a 2 things that dumbfounds me about my newest hero.....okay, he was going 85 miles an hour, I get that, but what I don't get is the fact, "according to the police report," the guy was in the back seat, apparently having sex, if true, this act of sex completely destroys the Pretzel Holds number one ranking in positions for sex.
The number 2 thing that totally flabbergasts me is the fact that when pressed, nobody in the car actually admitted that they were driving. I can understand the 21 year old not driving, being engaged with the women, but when the guy in the front seat did not admit to driving, well.....I just don't get it, somebody had to be driving the dam car.
The end result was that the "sex on wheels" car slammed into a Taxi Cab, causing extensive damage to both cars, and a lawsuit brought by the Cab driver. Tickets were issued for reckless endangerment to the 21 year old guy and the trial begins next week in Fairfax County Virginia. We here at Chronicle headquarters will follow the results of the trial.
BAGGY PANTS FOOTBALL PLAYER CUT FROM FLIGHT! (Fox Sports on MSN)
Everybody has seen kids running around wearing those baggy pants that seem to be down around their ankles with their boxer shorts covering the vital areas of their anatomy, and like must everybody, I've thought "what the hell is holding the dam things up?" Although nobody has ever told me, I finally have heard about an action that can be taken to eradicate the unsightly eye-sore.
But first lets take a quick look at why anybody would want to wear a pair of pants that look, for all intense and purposes like they are about ready fall to at least the knee. I have talked to several people, black, white and brown, I wanted to eliminate any racial profiling right out of the box.
What I was told, emphatically that the wearing of the sloppy, bagging pants was nothing more then a fashion statement, was not a rebel stance, or a status thing. I came away with the knowledge that the baggy attire was nothing more then a phase that kids were going through, and it would soon be replaced with some other outlandish garb that the marketing executives of the fashion world would push.
U.S. Airways solved the baggy pants issue once and for all, when an airlines employee noticed that DeShon Marman's pants were below his buttocks. I for one have never been embarrassed and offended by a kid walking around in baggy pants, below his buttocks, with his underwear showing. That was not the case for the female U.S. Airways official.
Apparently the airline has a dress code that takes, "no shoes, no shirt, no service" to a new level. The airline dress code must read something like "no shoes, no shirt and no potential butt cracks allowed." Marman and the female U.S. Air employee, it seems stubbornly refused to back off from their opinions, police were called, and the football player was carted off to jail to await legal action.
The only thing that I can say is that "the cloths Cops need to ratchet down a bit, their perceived authority stance." The kid was not hurting anybody, and there were no complaints from any of the passengers, what harm was the kid doing.
A U.S. Airways spokeswomen said that the airline's dress code forbids indecent exposure or inappropriate attire. To me, this is a blatant attempt to take a person's civil rights away, I mean who the hell is to determine what is appropriate and inappropriate, what if somebody is having a bad day, or is sexually challenged. What is our world coming to, what a waste of time, and possibly taxpayers money.
All I know is the next time I fly, I won't be wearing my Zomba's, they got a hole in the back, near my buttock.
THE WORST OF THE POLARIZED AGENTS, (Washington Post)
Charles Krauthhammer is at it again, the Fox newsie contributor, Washington Post and Weekly Standard columnist is now talking about the union-owned Democratic Party and President Obama. There are many things wrong with the Democratic Party, but one of them is not schmoozing up to unions, what for, unions have lost most of their power.
Union authority and power has wained badly in the United States over the past 30 years, that it's just a shadow of it's former self. Maybe Krauthammer missed it, but states around the country are in full attack on unions, their membership, and their ability to organize with almost any voice at all. Unions were formed in the United States for very good reasons, first and foremost to protect workers in the work place.
If management hadn't used the rules by which they operated, unions would have been unnecessary. The initial issues was worker safety, shorter work days and weeks, and better pay. Before 1937 many a worker saw his work-week last 6 days, 12 hours a day. If you were injured, you were tossed aside and a new worker took your place.
Of course unions went to extremes, demanding benefits that could never, in the long term, be honored. Negotiators had to know this as did the unions, yet ridiculous settlements between unions and management were met and we now seen the aftermath.
Unions are a necessity of American labor, without their protection, labor would revert to pre-1937 and that would be a terrible plight, not only for America's workers, but for the very fabric of the country. At the present time, most relationships between labor and management has a respectful relationship, but a big part of that relationship is do to union influence.
I understand Krauthammer's debilitating condition, and I am in awe of what he has done with his life and the productivity that has defined his life. But Charles, look at both sides before you bandy around your opinions so freely, think of both issues, both sides.
No comments:
Post a Comment